Virginia Giuffre’s family’s heartbreak turned to fury on December 13, 2025, when the Metropolitan Police abruptly dropped its investigation into claims that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor asked his taxpayer-funded bodyguard to dig up dirt on her in 2011—a potential smear campaign using her social security number and date of birth.
The Met announced on December 13 that, after assessment, no criminal investigation would proceed, citing “no additional evidence of criminal acts or misconduct.” The probe stemmed from an October 2025 Mail on Sunday report of a 2011 email where Andrew allegedly passed Giuffre’s details to his protection officer, seeking information amid her emerging allegations.
Giuffre’s family, including brother Sky Roberts, expressed “deep disappointment,” stating they were blindsided: “We emailed with a detective on Friday [December 12] who gave no indication this announcement was imminent.” They questioned the timing, noting the Epstein Files Transparency Act’s impending disclosures by December 19, and added, “Today we feel justice has not been served.”
The decision, following Andrew’s October 30 title revocation over Giuffre’s memoir Nobody’s Girl (detailing three alleged assaults at 17), drew criticism for perceived elite protection. No suggestion the officer acted on the request exists. The family vowed to “continue challenging the system that protects abusers.”
With public support at 70% for transparency, the abrupt closure—amid ongoing U.S. file releases—intensified perceptions of unequal justice.
The Met announced on December 13 that, after assessment, no criminal investigation would proceed, citing “no additional evidence of criminal acts or misconduct.” The probe stemmed from an October 2025 Mail on Sunday report of a 2011 email where Andrew allegedly passed Giuffre’s details to his protection officer, seeking information amid her emerging allegations.
Giuffre’s family, including brother Sky Roberts, expressed “deep disappointment,” stating they were blindsided: “We emailed with a detective on Friday [December 12] who gave no indication this announcement was imminent.” They questioned the timing, noting the Epstein Files Transparency Act’s impending disclosures by December 19, and added, “Today we feel justice has not been served.”
The decision, following Andrew’s October 30 title revocation over Giuffre’s memoir Nobody’s Girl (detailing three alleged assaults at 17), drew criticism for perceived elite protection. No suggestion the officer acted on the request exists. The family vowed to “continue challenging the system that protects abusers.”
With public support at 70% for transparency, the abrupt closure—amid ongoing U.S. file releases—intensified perceptions of unequal justice.
Leave a Reply