In a resurfaced video from a March 2010 deposition, Jeffrey Epstein faced pointed questions about his relationship with Donald Trump, offering a glimpse into the financier’s guarded associations. The deposition, taken in connection with civil litigation involving one of Epstein’s alleged victims, captured a moment that has fueled ongoing speculation.
The attorney first asked Epstein if he had a “personal relationship” with Trump. Epstein sought clarification: “What do you mean by ‘personal relationship,’ sir?” When pressed on whether he had socialized with Trump, Epstein admitted, “Yes, sir.” But the follow-up proved explosive: “Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?”
Epstein paused, subtly shook his head, and responded: “Though I’d like to answer that question, at least today I’m going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.” Invoking the Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination, a common tactic in civil cases where answers could expose criminal liability. Epstein’s broader invocation of the Sixth (right to fair trial) and 14th (due process) Amendments underscored his intent to remain silent.
This refusal stood out amid Epstein’s known social ties to Trump in the 1990s and early 2000s, including parties and flights on Epstein’s plane. Trump later distanced himself, reportedly banning Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after learning of his behavior. No criminal charges or credible accusations have ever linked Trump to Epstein’s underage exploitation.
The clip resurfaced in 2025 amid renewed scrutiny of Epstein files, highlighting how Epstein routinely pleaded the Fifth—over 500 times in some depositions—to shield details of his network. Victims’ advocates argue such evasions delayed justice, while legal experts note that invoking rights proves nothing substantive.
Epstein’s silence under oath, though legally protected, continues to echo as a symbol of the unanswered questions surrounding his elite connections.
Leave a Reply