In a revealing report published by Rolling Stone in August 2025, sources close to President Donald Trump claimed that, behind closed doors, he has expressed frustration with Jeffrey Epstein’s accusers and their families. According to two individuals familiar with his private conversations, Trump has criticized the media appearances of these survivors, suggesting that some are politically motivated to damage his reputation.
The report alleges that Trump described certain outspoken victims as “clearly of a ‘Democrat’ political affiliation.” He reportedly questioned whether they were coordinating with liberal attorneys or groups, implying their statements were part of a scheme to imply wrongdoing on his part during his past association with Epstein. Trump has long maintained that he distanced himself from the convicted sex offender years ago and had no knowledge of his crimes.

This comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the Trump administration’s handling of Epstein-related files. Victims and lawmakers from both parties have pushed for full transparency, but the Justice Department has released only limited documents, citing protections for survivors and ongoing concerns. The scandal has persisted, with public polling showing widespread disapproval of the administration’s approach.
A White House official strongly denied the Rolling Stone allegations, stating, “None of this is true,” and calling it “just another desperate attempt by the failing Rolling Stone.” Critics argue that politicizing victims’ voices undermines efforts for justice, while supporters view such reports as biased attacks.
Trump’s past friendship with Epstein, including social ties in the 1990s and early 2000s, has fueled speculation. However, no evidence has emerged linking him to Epstein’s criminal activities. The president’s private remarks, if accurate, highlight the polarized nature of the issue, where personal trauma intersects with political battles.
As calls for unredacted file releases continue, this reporting adds another layer to a story that refuses to fade, raising questions about accountability and the treatment of survivors in high-profile cases.
Leave a Reply